Thursday, October 12, 2006
The Connecticut Campaign Trail - Governor
The first debate among the top two candidates for governor happened Monday
night. I didn't even know it was on. How sad is that? I knew it was coming up,
because of arguments over format and who was permitted to debate, but I didn't
see any mention of it in Sunday's paper. I wonder if it was even televised.
Anyway, for those of you unfamiliar with CT politics, the debate was between
incumbent Jodi Rell (R) and challenger John DeStefano (D), mayor of New Haven.
Left out of the debate were Cliff Thornton of the Green Party and Joe Zdonczyk
of the Concerned Citizens Party. While Thornton met all of the qualifications
of the League of Women Voters, The Day of New London stymied his
appearence. I bet those assholes have a stake in either one of the top two
contenders. Hell, they probably sided with the government in that infamous
eminent domain battle that took place in their city. Did you notice that with
all of the outrage, the CT legislature didn't do shit about reforming the
state's eminent domain laws?
Rell has a tough job running a state with a Democrat controlled legislature.
While her cabinet works well with her, despite being Democrats, she can't seem
to get much cooperation from the legislature, who view her as tainted from her
predecessor's
administration. Although Rell cleaned house, the Democrats said that it
wasn't enough. No matter. Rell has sought tax relief for CT's citizens through
elimination (she later tried for reduction) of the property tax on cars.
DeStefano has proposed having a windfall tax on profits made by the utilities
and plans on giving that money to ratepayers, conservation funds, and business
energy conservation efforts. I thought that I heard on NPR that he accused Rell
of covering up a 50% rate hike due to hit us in 2007. I can't confirm this
though. Since we're already paying 15 cents per kilowatt-hour (10.14 cents power
generation and 5.21 cents for transmission of said power), that would be rough.
We just had a 40% rate hike in our power generation charges this
January. How much more can we take? It certainly makes the ROI for a wind
turbine or solar panels happen that much sooner.
When asked which senate candidate Rell thinks would be best for CT, she gave a
long winded explanation which was summarized somewhere along the lines of "they
all bring something to the table." DeStefano jabbed her on it. "I pray that I'll
never be in politics so long as to give an answer like that."
From what I've read, it seems like DeStefano won the debate. But he's down 30
points in the polls so his is an uphill climb. Democrats want universal health
care for CT citizens, which is a wonderful idea, but how are we going to pay for
it? I can't endorse him. If the entire state government were to be controlled
by Democrats, I'd be bleeding taxes out my eyes. The "tax and spend liberal"
tag holds true in my state. Anyone who reads my blog knows that I'm no
card-carrying Republican. We've got car taxes (does anyone else have one?),
sales tax, property taxes on our homes, the highest gasoline tax in the country,
and a state income tax. We've been running a budget surplus for a couple of
years now and that surplus is being put into the "rainy day fund", which
currently stands at $1 billion. Can't we cut taxes? We don't seem to be
doing anything about the fact that we have the highest per capita debt service
in the country.
I might vote for Rell. She's done a good job keeping her nose clean and doesn't
play dirty politics. She also doesn't take any money from special interest
groups. How rare is that? I also think that so long as CT's legislature is
dominated by Democrats, we need to have a check on their agenda. Gee. That
sounds like there's a system of checks and balances to prevent one form of
government from taking over. Wish we had that on the national level.
I might even vote for Cliff Thornton of the Green Party, although he's even more
of a long shot than DeStefano. I like where he stands on alot of the issues and
he's actually got plans for solving some of the state's problems that sound
more libertarian than liberal.
\_/ DED
3 Comments:
Alan P. said...
-
I plan to vote for all the incumbents in the state races (OK). I plan to dump
all the federal incumbents. No serious complaints with state government here.
That's not to say there aren't problems (like prison overcrowding) but like you
we have a rainy day fund and even got a general state tax refund last year. I
don't generally agree with the bible thumpers that occupy state offices but at
least I know what I'm getting and there haven't been any scandals lately. That's
the best I can hope for.
- 10/12/2006 11:44 PM
Mike said...
-
I haven't decided how I'll vote, but as you guys probably know, NY
legislative seats tend to be entrenched with one party of the other. I don't
think a Dem has lost in my district since they ran against the Whigs.
- 10/13/2006 11:37 AM
DED said...
-
Mort: Good to hear that someone's state is in decent shape.
Mike: "Entrenched" is a good word for it.
Lost power today for 3.5
hours. Don't know why. Beautiful day with a slight breeze. Temp's in the upper
50's. Gorgeous Fall day. But at least I wasn't alone this time. Apparently a
good portion of Danbury went down too. Maybe tomorrow's paper will have
something.
- 10/13/2006 11:33 PM
<< Home |
|
About Me

Name: DED Location: United States
I'm a stay-at-home Dad who survived dotcom burnout and a
chemical engineering career that fizzled. While the kids are in school,
I'm free to write stories.
I'm a rational environmentalist, science and technology enthusiast, who leans
libertarian, reads and watches sci-fi, drinks and brews beer, and listens to
metal.
|