Wednesday, August 09, 2006
The Connecticut Campaign Trail
First in a series of bloggings about the electoral races which directly
affect me this year.
Well, you all know by now that Lamont beat Lieberman for the Democratic party
nomination for Lieberman's senate seat. Even if you don't follow politics, there
was no way you could avoid the story. And Lieberman has made it quite clear
that he will now run as an independent. The 52%-48% voter margin should give Joe
plenty of incentive that he can still win it.
I have no objection to Lieberman running as an independent, per se. He
complains that the Democratic party has been hijacked by extremists and that his
devotion to the state of Connecticut demands that he run. On the surface, these
sound like admirable ideals to an independent voter like myself, but Joe's
either fooling himself, or trying to fool us.
The Philadelphia Inquirer (link is dead) does a bang up job
analyzing the situation.
Issues aside, Lieberman also lost because he had too few friends at
the street level. Tip O'Neill, the late House speaker, famously said that "all
politics is local," and this race proved it. Local political leaders went years
without hearing from him; earlier this summer, top Democrats in the town of
Southbury complained - into an open mike at the state convention - that they had
phoned Lieberman in January, and were still waiting for him to return the
call.
Doesn't sound like dedication to the state of Connecticut to me. More likely,
Joe thinks that after 18 years in the Senate, the seat is his until the day he
dies. In my opinion, he's a pompous, self-serving ass. He's so full of himself,
he can't imagine the people of Connecticut surviving without him. I've never
liked Lieberman and never voted for him. While I don't condemn him for his
choice to go into Iraq (unlike alot of Democrats), his other political views
have grated me. He's out of touch with a great many of the people in this state,
including me, as exemplified by his socially conservative stance.
For years, Democrats here have groused about, among other things,
Lieberman's alliances with Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell and Lynne Cheney on
conservative values; his frequent guest shots on Sean Hannity's Fox show; his
pro-GOP vote to keep Terri Schiavo alive; his belief that hospitals should not
be required to provide emergency contraception to rape victims; his opposition,
as a '70s state senator, to the legality of living wills; his skeptical views on
affirmative action; his failure, during his 2000 vice presidential debate, to
get tough with Dick Cheney.
The White House had this to say (from the
Hartford Courant):
White House spokesman Tony Snow, meanwhile, called the primary "a
defining moment for the Democratic Party, whose national leaders now have made
it clear that if you disagree with the extreme left in their party they're going
to come after you."
But that simply isn't true. Just ask Cynthia McKinney (D), Georgia's first black
congresswoman. She's berated W for her entire political career, but she lost
the party nomination for her seat. She blames the media, of course.
No, this looks like what I, and fellow blogger,
Mike,
have been calling for since we started: Voting out the incumbents, no matter
what their party affiliation, if they're not representing you. Other
incumbents have fallen: Cunningham, Delay, Ney. Many more may follow. I hope so.
So now I have to figure out where Lamont stands on all the other issues. Iraq
was the one that got him the nod. Is he more than that?
Schlesinger, the Republican candidate, doesn't have much hope as his gambling
problems have led to mild mannered governor Rell (R) to ask him to step aside.
And I can't figure out if the Libertarian Party is even trying to field a
candidate this year. Their website sucks
(at least at the time I wrote this) and doesn't appear to have been
updated since Harry Browne died in March. Not very reassuring.
You know, I was going to call this segment, "A Connecticut Citizen's Conundrum",
but it seemed too wordy and too long. But, given my choices for the Senate, I'd
say that it was accurate nonetheless.
\_/
DED
4 Comments:
 Alan P. said...
-
All Joe can hope to do is split the democrat vote thereby handing his seat to
a republican. Thirty plus years isn't enough for him. He has to get back to
D.C. for the good of the people. Yeah, right. Time to take your medicine Mr.
Lieberman.
- 8/09/2006 7:58 PM
DED said...
-
No, I don't think that the Republican has a chance. Last I saw, he was at 13%
in the polls. It really looks like there will be a full-fledged rematch between
Lamont and Lieberman in November.
- 8/09/2006 11:22 PM
Alan P. said...
Kewl beans, grudge match II. - 8/10/2006 2:20 AM
 Mike said...-
Which may be interesting, since Lieberman must get much of his support from
Republicans.
Without a legit GOPer to siphon votes from Joe, this
could be tough.
We know the national GOP's gonna get out the vote for
their "Independent" friend.
- 8/10/2006 6:47 AM
<< Home |
|
About Me
Name: DED
Location: United States
I'm a stay-at-home Dad who survived dotcom burnout and a
chemical engineering career that fizzled. While the kids are in school,
I'm free to write stories.
I'm a rational environmentalist, science and technology enthusiast, who leans
libertarian, reads and watches sci-fi, drinks and brews beer, and listens to
metal.
View
my complete profile
|
