Monday, July 17, 2006
Hot Enough For Ya?
It's a mere 93° in the shade on my back porch at 12:30 EST. That's
nothing compared to South Dakota a couple of days ago, which hit 117, the
highest temperature ever recorded in the state. Sub-zero in the winter.
Phoenix-like heat in the summer. What a swell place.
Last night, the Discovery Channel showed "Global Warming - What You Need To
Know." If you didn't catch it, record it, or Tivo it, then do so. Tom
Brokaw narrated it. I don't know how it compares to Gore's "An Inconvenient
Truth" as I haven't seen that one yet. But I imagine they cover the same
territory.
Anyway, I thought that Brokaw's version was really well done. They covered a lot
of the evidence and showed much of the impact that it's already having. And I
appreciated the fact that they didn't make carbon dioxide out to be a pollutant.
They rationally explained the carbon cycle and how we're contributing to it.
There's a statistic that often goes misunderstood, but was brought up in the
documentary. When people hear that the global average temperature has gone up 1
degree, they say, "big deal!" But it is a big deal. What often goes
unsaid is that during the last ice age, the average global temperature was
only 11 degrees cooler (though in this documentary I believe they stated
9 degrees). So, put it in perspective. If we're only above an ice age by 10
degrees or so, then what will be the impact of 1 or 2 degree temperature
increases in the global average bring?
And the other major point is that the rate at which CO2 is being
pumped into the atmosphere is increasing. I didn't mind that the US didn't sign
the Kyoto Protocols. I didn't buy into the whole whining bit about "Oh it's
gonna hurt our economy... waaaaa" crap. We're pissing tens of billions of
dollars into Iraq each year and the economy has been doing just fine (at least
if you ask a gov't spokesman). It's the fact that developing nations like India
and China were exempt. Anyone who follows the global economy can tell you that
these two countries have been growing like gangbusters over the last few years.
To maintain that growth, they've needed to expend alot of energy. In China's
case, that means burning lots of coal. China is already the #4 economy in the
world and I believe that it may be, or soon will be, the #2 contributor to
carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Therefore, why should they be exempt?
I don't trust the US government to help much. There's too much money and
resources being expended in the neverending war on terrorists, would be
terrorists, terrorist sympathizers, and political opponents. Here's a case where
capitalism might be a better hope. If there's money to be made in something,
businesses will follow. Don't believe me? Just have a look at the organic food
industry. What started out as just a bunch of hippies has blossomed into a
multi-billion dollar industry. Even the big supermarket chains have organic food
sections. The same needs to happen for other industries, especially
automobiles, construction, and power generation. We need to change a little
today or sacrifice alot tomorrow.
7 Comments:
Mike said...
-
Good stuff, DED. I hear what you're saying.
India & China will get
on-board (along with Uncle Sam) when it hits them in the pocketbooks not to do
so.
Til then . . . they won't change a damn thing.
- 7/17/2006 4:20 PM
Alan P. said...
- 107 deg. F yesterday in Oklahoma. Looks like it's gonna
be another hot one today as well. Ded, You posted the first ever comment at my
blog. You didn't win anything but I am going to add you and Mike's links over
there if you guys don't mind.
- 7/20/2006 12:34 PM
DED said...
-
Thanks Mort! But only link to my blog if you like it. If you look through my
posts and think I'm a dick you'll probably regret linking to it. Then again you
could always pull the link.
\_/
- 7/20/2006 11:19 PM
jnubel said...
-
I did tivo the episode but have not watched it yet. Do you remember my uranium
blog earlier this year (I believe as a side comment to your aluminum stock),
well alternative energy forms and global warming were key factors in me getting
on board. I'd like to see Al Gore's movie too on the subject.
- 7/24/2006 5:39 PM
DED said...
- Jim: How has the uranium sector done since then? Too
soon for much movement yet?
- 7/25/2006 1:13 PM
jnubel said...
- I've only been a part of the uranium picture since
early this year. I took a few small holdings in some "juniors" and I am
basically break even (some better, some worse). The spot price of uranium has
probably gone from about $40/lb to $45/lb today. I wish I had only know a few
years back when the spot price was under $10/lb. If you want some reading try
these links (warning: they are long)
http://rsch1.ml.com/9093/24013/ds/4647_327.PDF
http://www.sprott.com/pdf/climate.pdf
- 7/25/2006 1:48 PM
jnubel said...
-
I finally got around to watching this last night. Well only the first half
anyway. I'm almost too frightened to watch the second half since many times I
felt like assuming a fetal position. 60 minutes had an interview this past
Sunday with NASA's James Hansen who appears in this documentary. I guess he was
free to speak in this forum. He made it seem like in his 60 minutes interview
that he is censored much like Adrian Cronauer was (Robin Williams) in Good
Morning Vietman in his day job.
- 8/02/2006 4:57 PM
<< Home |
|
About Me

Name: DED Location: United States
I'm a stay-at-home Dad who survived dotcom burnout and a
chemical engineering career that fizzled. While the kids are in school,
I'm free to write stories.
I'm a rational environmentalist, science and technology enthusiast, who leans
libertarian, reads and watches sci-fi, drinks and brews beer, and listens to
metal.
View
my complete profile
|