Monday, June 26, 2006
Stop Breathing! You're Destroying the Planet!
Ever wonder what the difference is between a rational and irrational
environmentalist? Well,
here's an example.
A rational environmentalist would just call this silly. Trying to declare
Carbon Dioxide as a pollutant is inane. CO2 is a naturally occuring
compound. It's the by-product of Life! Anyone who wasn't brain dead in school
would know that we breathe in oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide. If the
government is forced to treat CO2 as a pollutant, then every living
thing on this planet becomes a polluter! Even plants switch over at night.
And what about volcanoes? Although infrequent, they certainly spew out tons of
carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases when they erupt.
Will it mean that people can't have camp fires? What about barbecues? Will I
still be able to use my wood stove to heat my home?
If this goes through, there will be the usual outcry of, "Judges are trying to
legislate from the bench!" Of course I don't see that as being any different
than the President making them up as he goes along.
But more importantly, if this goes through, we'll be allowing an inept
bureaucracy to regulate something else. Maybe there will be an exemption for
living things, but maybe there won't. I don't know how much carbon dioxide a
person exhales over the course of a year, but given the propensity of government
to screw things up, I can see someone arguing in court that obese people
generate more carbon dioxide than people within acceptable weight limits.
Granted, cutting down on obesity is a good thing, but having the government
enforce it flies in the face of Freedom.
As absurd as all this sounds, it really isn't far-fetched. "Common sense" has
been legislated all over the country. We've got smoking bans, DUI laws, and
recreational drugs are illegal. All those things are obviously harmful to
individuals and even the people around them, but we also need permits to go
fishing. Where's the harm i that? Oh, too many people are taking away too many
fish. Yeah, right. Someone needs to tell that to the drift netters.
You want pollutants? How about polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's), dioxins,
pesticides, and volatile organic compounds (VOC's). You can even throw sulfur
compounds in there too, even though they occur in nature, since they do more
harm than good. You run the risk of cancer, renal failure, or asphyxiation,
depending on which pollutant you're dealing with. Now those are pollutants.
I realize that reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is a good
thing, and that it's imperative we get a handle on it sooner rather than later,
but getting carbon dioxide labelled as a pollutant isn't the way to go. You
might piss off the trees. But seriously, this administration is hopeless. If you
want the government to act responsibly towards the environment, vote for an
environmentally friendly congressional candidate no matter what party they're
in, though make sure they've got a record to back it up. And check your own
CO2 output. No one likes a hypocrite.
<< Home |
|
About Me

Name: DED Location: United States
I'm a stay-at-home Dad who survived dotcom burnout and a
chemical engineering career that fizzled. While the kids are in school,
I'm free to write stories.
I'm a rational environmentalist, science and technology enthusiast, who leans libertarian, reads and watches sci-fi, drinks and brews beer, and listens to metal.
|